<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taxing Issues - Property Tax Blog &#187; Chris Janata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intlappraisal.com/blog/author/cjanata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intlappraisal.com/blog</link>
	<description>Property Tax Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Texas Property Tax Appeal Pilot Program &#8211; New Rules of Procedure for Appraisal Review Board Appeals</title>
		<link>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/texas-property-tax-appeal-pilot-program-new-rules-of-procedure-for-appraisal-review-board-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/texas-property-tax-appeal-pilot-program-new-rules-of-procedure-for-appraisal-review-board-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Janata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intlappraisal.com/blog/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following up on our post Texas  Property Tax Appeal Pilot Program, the State Office of Administrative  Hearings (SOAH) has proposed new Chapter 165 (165.1 &#8211; 165.29) that clarifies the  types and number of appeals that may be filed and establishes procedures for  hearings on such appeals. For the first five-year period [...]<hr />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following up on our post <a href="http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2009/texas-property-tax-appeal-pilot-program/">Texas  Property Tax Appeal Pilot Program,</a> the State Office of Administrative  Hearings (SOAH) has proposed new <a href="http://www.sos.state.tx.us/texreg/pdf/backview/1113/1113prop.pdf">Chapter 165 </a>(165.1 &#8211; 165.29) that clarifies the  types and number of appeals that may be filed and establishes procedures for  hearings on such appeals. For the first five-year period the new chapter is in  effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a  result of enforcing it and no anticipated economic cost to individuals who are  required to comply.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fintlappraisal.com%2Fblog%2F2010%2Ftexas-property-tax-appeal-pilot-program-new-rules-of-procedure-for-appraisal-review-board-appeals%2F&amp;linkname=Texas%20Property%20Tax%20Appeal%20Pilot%20Program%20%26%238211%3B%20New%20Rules%20of%20Procedure%20for%20Appraisal%20Review%20Board%20Appeals"><img src="http://intlappraisal.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/texas-property-tax-appeal-pilot-program-new-rules-of-procedure-for-appraisal-review-board-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bottom Feeding Investors &amp; Commercial Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/bottom-feeding-investors-commercial-real-estate/</link>
		<comments>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/bottom-feeding-investors-commercial-real-estate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Janata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intlappraisal.com/blog/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Bottom-feeding&#8221; investors a sign of stabilization? Foreign banks and US private equity firms are stimulating the U.S. commercial real estate sector. But rising interest rates may pose a threat.
<hr />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/94ea0c80-fe51-11de-9340-00144feab49a.html">&#8220;Bottom-feeding&#8221; investors a sign of stabilization?</a> Foreign banks and US private equity firms are stimulating the U.S. commercial real estate sector. But rising interest rates may pose a threat.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fintlappraisal.com%2Fblog%2F2010%2Fbottom-feeding-investors-commercial-real-estate%2F&amp;linkname=Bottom%20Feeding%20Investors%20%26amp%3B%20Commercial%20Real%20Estate"><img src="http://intlappraisal.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/bottom-feeding-investors-commercial-real-estate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WI Court Exceeded Authority by Using Internet to Research Property Value</title>
		<link>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/wi-court-exceeded-authority-by-using-internet-to-research-property-value/</link>
		<comments>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/wi-court-exceeded-authority-by-using-internet-to-research-property-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Janata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intlappraisal.com/blog/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Wisconsin circuit court review of a  board of review’s decision is limited to the record made before the board, and  the court may not conduct its own factual inquiry or admit any new evidence.
Sager v. Board of Review of Town of Taycheedah, Wisconsin  Court of Appeals, No. 2009AP972, December 30, 2009, [...]<hr />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://wcca.wicourts.gov/images/header_1.gif" alt="" width="97" height="94" /><img class="alignnone" src="http://wcca.wicourts.gov/images/header_2.gif" alt="" width="450" height="94" /></p>
<p>The Wisconsin circuit court review of a  board of review’s decision is limited to the record made before the board, and  the court may not conduct its own factual inquiry or admit any new evidence.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&amp;seqNo=45178"><em>Sager v. Board of Review of Town of Taycheedah</em></a>, Wisconsin  Court of Appeals, No. 2009AP972, December 30, 2009, ¶401-273</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fintlappraisal.com%2Fblog%2F2010%2Fwi-court-exceeded-authority-by-using-internet-to-research-property-value%2F&amp;linkname=WI%20Court%20Exceeded%20Authority%20by%20Using%20Internet%20to%20Research%20Property%20Value"><img src="http://intlappraisal.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2010/wi-court-exceeded-authority-by-using-internet-to-research-property-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporting Change of Ownership In California</title>
		<link>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2009/reporting-change-of-ownership-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2009/reporting-change-of-ownership-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Janata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change of Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Tax Penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Assessment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intlappraisal.com/blog/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Bill 816, effective January 1, 2010, could result in the imposition of significant penalties on unwary taxpayers for failing to report changes in control or ownership of legal entities in California.<hr />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0801-0850/sb_816_bill_20091011_chaptered.pdf">Senate Bill 816</a>, effective January 1, 2010, could result in the imposition of significant penalties on unwary taxpayers for failing to report changes in control or ownership of legal entities in California. It imposes a new, automatic 10% penalty for failure to file a change-in-ownership statement to the State Board of Equalization (SBE) within 45 days. The penalty will be 10% of the taxes applicable to the new base year reflecting the change in ownership. Previously, the acquiring entity was required to file a change-in-ownership statement with the SBE. However, no penalty was imposed for not filing, unless the SBE specifically requested such a statement. SB816 changes all that. Now taxpayers will incur the penalty if they do not file within 45 days, regardless if the SBE requests the statement or not. If the SBE requests the statement, taxpayers must respond within 45 days, even if no change took place, to avoid incurring the penalty.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fintlappraisal.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2Freporting-change-of-ownership-in-california%2F&amp;linkname=Reporting%20Change%20of%20Ownership%20In%20California"><img src="http://intlappraisal.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2009/reporting-change-of-ownership-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
