<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Property Tax Appeals &#8211; Avoiding The Lag Trap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2009/2009-property-tax-appeals-avoiding-the-lag-trap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2009/2009-property-tax-appeals-avoiding-the-lag-trap/</link>
	<description>Property Tax Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:27:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jay strauss</title>
		<link>http://intlappraisal.com/blog/2009/2009-property-tax-appeals-avoiding-the-lag-trap/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>jay strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intlappraisal.com/blog/?p=59#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Question: a bank forcloses on property and wins a judment bid for their interest in the property, which was purchased for 97,000....but the judgment bid is $137,000 including their &quot;interest in the property&quot;.....would it be fair for the tax assessor to then revalue for tax purposes based on the judgment bid.....while dozens of similar properties are still assessed at appr. 97-99,000....thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: a bank forcloses on property and wins a judment bid for their interest in the property, which was purchased for 97,000&#8230;.but the judgment bid is $137,000 including their &#8220;interest in the property&#8221;&#8230;..would it be fair for the tax assessor to then revalue for tax purposes based on the judgment bid&#8230;..while dozens of similar properties are still assessed at appr. 97-99,000&#8230;.thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
