logo
  • Home

Subscribe to Articles

Subscribe

 RSS

Email Alerts

Email Brett

Visit Our Website

http://www.intlappraisal.com

Twitter Updates

  • Public Companies Continue to Have Upper Hand in Commercial Real Estate Market http://t.co/BSkIXuqo 2011-10-28
  • Chicago property tax 101 http://t.co/1y93FqQr 2011-10-28
  • Commercial real estate players expect slow recovery in 2012 http://t.co/VAcxHfmt 2011-10-27
  • National Retail Investment Report Fall 2011 http://t.co/YkcuFvrk 2011-10-26
  • More updates...
http://www.twitterbuttons.com

Recent Posts

  • Ohio Property Tax Appeals & Purchase Price Presumption
  • Virginia Property Tax Procedural Changes
  • Indiana Property Tax Assessment and Valuation Rules Amended
  • Persuasive Obsolescence Arguments Win Property Tax Appeals
  • Georgia’s “Property Tax Reform” Bill

Archives

  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009

Blogroll

  • 2009 Property Tax Calendar
  • IAC Website

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

2009 Property Tax Appeals – Avoiding The Lag Trap

Author: Brett Harrington Category: Property Tax, Tax Appeal Tags: 2009 Tax Appeals, Assessment, Property Tax, Property Tax Appeal, Property Tax Protest, Tax Assessment

Monday
Mar 23, 2009

Why we need to be diligent in conducting property tax assessment reviews. 

There are situations where, because of the ridiculous run up on property values over the past few years, a property’s assessment may have lagged behind the market and may have been under assessed. Even with the recent dramatic declines in property values the property may still be equitably or under assessed. 

Let’s say that you receive your 2009 assessment notice indicating the assessment of a property to be $1,000,000. The property was assessed at $1,000,000 for the 2008 tax year as well. Some might immediately say that there is no way the property is worth the same amount in 2009 as it was in 2008 and an appeal needs to be filed. However, let’s say that in 2008 the actual market value of the property was closer to $1,500,000, not the $1,000,000 that it was assessed at. If the value of the property has decreased by 30% between 2008 and now, the property might still be fairly assessed at $1,000,000. 

Without a proper review of the current and past market values of the property you might find yourself trapped into an unwarranted appeal. At best, money and resources are dedicated to an appeal with no savings potential and, at worst, you could find yourself fighting an increase. 

There are many savings opportunities out there and, of course, we need to be aggressive in discovering and pursuing them. However, we also must maintain a rational and diligent approach.

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments

Avatar

jay strauss

April 23rd, 2009 at 1:33 pm

Question: a bank forcloses on property and wins a judment bid for their interest in the property, which was purchased for 97,000….but the judgment bid is $137,000 including their “interest in the property”…..would it be fair for the tax assessor to then revalue for tax purposes based on the judgment bid…..while dozens of similar properties are still assessed at appr. 97-99,000….thanks


Click here to cancel reply.

Comment Form

Copyright 2012 Taxing Issues – Property Tax Blog - All Rights reserved.

Wordpress theme by: WPUnlimited