logo
  • Home

Subscribe to Articles

Subscribe

 RSS

Email Alerts

Email Brett

Visit Our Website

http://www.intlappraisal.com

Twitter Updates

  • Kansas personal property renditions are due March 15th – Make sure to take advantage of property tax exemptions. http://bit.ly/aBU8D8 22 hrs ago
  • Oregon - Taxpayer must show " good and sufficient cause" for not filing a personal property tax return. http://bit.ly/cqLnqp 1 day ago
  • Even amid bad times, there'€™s still money to be made - Business Courier of Cincinnati:: http://bit.ly/cRJcW7 via @addthis 4 days ago
  • Illinois: Property Tax Appeal Board erroneously allowed a property owner to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. http://goo.gl/l4sa 4 days ago
  • More updates...
http://www.twitterbuttons.com

Recent Posts

  • Kansas personal property renditions are due March 15th – Make sure to take advantage of property tax exemptions
  • Texas Property Tax Appeal Pilot Program – New Rules of Procedure for Appraisal Review Board Appeals
  • Bottom Feeding Investors & Commercial Real Estate
  • WI Court Exceeded Authority by Using Internet to Research Property Value
  • Reporting Change of Ownership In California

Archives

  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009

Blogroll

  • 2009 Property Tax Calendar
  • IAC Website

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Kansas personal property renditions are due March 15th – Make sure to take advantage of property tax exemptions

Author: Brett Harrington Category: Personal Property, Property Tax Tags: Kansas Property Tax, personal property assessment, personal property reporting, personal property tax, personal property tax exemptions, Property Tax, property tax exemption, Property Tax Information, Tax Assessment

Tuesday
Mar 9, 2010

Kansas offers property tax exemptions relating to “commercial/industrial machinery and equipment” that could be very beneficial to taxpayers owning or leasing personal property. They are as follows: 

Commercial/Industrial Machinery and Equipment Exemption:

Any qualified purchase or lease of machinery and equipment made after June 30, 2006 is exempt from property taxation in Kansas. Of course, there are a few clarifications to keep in mind. The term “Acquired” does not include stock purchases, mergers, reorganizations or other internal transfers. However, it does include transfers of property into Kansas after June 30th for the purposes of expansion, replacement or creation of a new business. 

Qualified Purchase is defined as: 

a purchase of commercial and industrial machinery and equipment for fair and valuable consideration where such machinery and equipment is physically transferred to the purchaser to be used in the purchaser’s business or trade.

 

Qualified Lease is defined as: 

a lease of commercial and industrial machinery and equipment for not less than 30 days for fair and valuable consideration where such machinery and equipment is physically transferred to the lessee to be used in the lessee’s business or trade.

 

$1,500 Exemption for Commercial Equipment:

Commercial/Industrial equipment “items” with a “retail cost when new” (RCWN) of $1,500 or less are exempt from property taxation. Again, there are two things to pay close attention to when determining whether or not the equipment is eligible for the exemption:

Retail cost when new:

Retail cost when new (RCWN): The Kansas Constitution requires the valuation process for machinery and equipment in the “Commercial” subclass begin with the “retail cost when new”. For purposes of personal property taxation, RCWN is the total amount a consumer would pay to acquire new property in order to use it to produce income over a period of years in a commercial or industrial setting. Retail cost when new is not the used sale price, and it is not the wholesale or manufacturer’s cost. It is the dollar amount an item would cost a consumer when the item is purchased new at the retail level of trade. For purposes of personal property taxation, the term “retail cost when new” does not include sales tax or freight and installation charges that are separate and readily discernible from the set retail price.

 What is considered an “Item”:

For purposes of the $1500 exemption an “item” is generally going to be a single line item as it is reported on a rendition. Exceptions to this general rule are: 

1. If the line item represents a group of like goods that can be used independently and they have the same or similar cost, the line item is actually several “items”. The RCWN of each “item” may qualify for the exemption. 

2. In that an “item” is the smallest quantity that may be used independently, one pen, one sheet of paper or one rubber band represents a material and supply “item”. The RCWN of each “item” that can be independently used may qualify for the exemption. Materials and supplies are classified under the “Other” subclass of personal property. Personal property in the “Other” subclass is listed on schedule 6 of the rendition. See the “Other Personal Property Not Elsewhere Classified” section in this guide for information on valuing materials and supplies.

More information on these exemptions can be found in the 2010 Personal Property Valuation Guide,  K.S.A. 201 and K.S.A. 79-223.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

Texas Property Tax Appeal Pilot Program – New Rules of Procedure for Appraisal Review Board Appeals

Author: Chris Janata Category: Property Tax

Wednesday
Jan 13, 2010

Following up on our post Texas Property Tax Appeal Pilot Program, the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) has proposed new Chapter 165 (165.1 – 165.29) that clarifies the types and number of appeals that may be filed and establishes procedures for hearings on such appeals. For the first five-year period the new chapter is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing it and no anticipated economic cost to individuals who are required to comply.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

Bottom Feeding Investors & Commercial Real Estate

Author: Chris Janata Category: Property Tax

Monday
Jan 11, 2010

“Bottom-feeding” investors a sign of stabilization? Foreign banks and US private equity firms are stimulating the U.S. commercial real estate sector. But rising interest rates may pose a threat.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

WI Court Exceeded Authority by Using Internet to Research Property Value

Author: Chris Janata Category: Property Tax

Friday
Jan 8, 2010

The Wisconsin circuit court review of a board of review’s decision is limited to the record made before the board, and the court may not conduct its own factual inquiry or admit any new evidence.

Sager v. Board of Review of Town of Taycheedah, Wisconsin Court of Appeals, No. 2009AP972, December 30, 2009, ¶401-273

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

Reporting Change of Ownership In California

Author: Chris Janata Category: Property Tax Tags: California Property Tax, Change of Ownership, Property Tax, Property Tax Penalties, Tax Assessment

Thursday
Dec 17, 2009

Senate Bill 816, effective January 1, 2010, could result in the imposition of significant penalties on unwary taxpayers for failing to report changes in control or ownership of legal entities in California. It imposes a new, automatic 10% penalty for failure to file a change-in-ownership statement to the State Board of Equalization (SBE) within 45 days. The penalty will be 10% of the taxes applicable to the new base year reflecting the change in ownership. Previously, the acquiring entity was required to file a change-in-ownership statement with the SBE. However, no penalty was imposed for not filing, unless the SBE specifically requested such a statement. SB816 changes all that. Now taxpayers will incur the penalty if they do not file within 45 days, regardless if the SBE requests the statement or not. If the SBE requests the statement, taxpayers must respond within 45 days, even if no change took place, to avoid incurring the penalty.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

Summation Methodology Incorrect For Kansas Property Tax Valuation

Author: Brett Harrington Category: Appraisal, Property Tax Tags: Kansas Property Tax, Property Tax, Property Tax Appeal, Property Tax Appeals, Property Tax Protest, Tax Assessment

Thursday
Dec 10, 2009

The Kansas Court of Appeals recently reversed a decision by the District Court that set aside the opinion of the Kansas Board of Tax Appeals. At the center of the case was the valuation methodology employed by the taxing jurisdiction’s appraiser. The Court of Appeals found that the jurisdiction’s expert witness not only erred, but also violated USPAP by valuing the various segments of the property and summing the individual values to arrive at an overall valuation conclusion. The court relied upon USPAP Standard Rule 1-4(e):

“Pursuant to USPAP Standard Rule 1-4(e) (2001), an appraiser must analyze the effect on value, if any, of the assemblage of the various estates or component parts of a property and refrain from valuing the whole solely by adding together the individual values of the various estates or component parts. Although the value of the whole may be equal to the sum of the separate estates or parts, it also may be greater or less than the sum of such estates or parts. Therefore, the value of the whole must be tested by reference to appropriate data and supported by an appropriate analysis of such data.”

The Court goes on to state:

“There is no question that Kubert violated USPAP Rule 1-4(e). In executing each of his approaches to value, Kubert segmented the property, valued each segment individually, and then added the values to get his final valuation.”

The case can be found here.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

When It Comes To Property Tax Appeals GOOD Information Is Imperative

Author: Brett Harrington Category: Property Tax, Tax Appeal Tags: Property Tax, Property Tax Appeal, Property Tax Appeals, Tax Assessment

Wednesday
Sep 16, 2009

As property tax professionals we rely on market information to support our cases for reducing assessments. Of course, all information is not created equal. Now, more than ever, it is extremely important to dig deep when it comes to the information gathering process.

We are starting to see a trickle of transactions (both sales and leases) after the severe drought we have been experiencing. However, many property owners are being creative (or desperate) in order to sell or lease their properties. This is where the necessity of proper research comes into play. Knowing as much about a transaction as possible will paint a more accurate picture of the market and ultimately valuations.

When researching sales it is important to keep in mind that many property owners have found themselves in a bind, to say the least. Almost $165 billion in commercial loans are coming due this year as landlords struggle with rental rate and occupancy declines and higher cap rates. This is creating problems with refinancing and/or keeping current on loans. Defaults, foreclosures and bankruptcies are plentiful right now and in the opinion of many industry professionals this trend will continue into 2010. So, when researching sales it is very important to know the conditions of the sale and the motivations of the participants.

When it comes to leases, landlords are getting creative in order to maintain occupancies or fill vacancies. Free rent periods, reduced rent and significant tenant improvement allowances are just a few of the many concessions being offered to tenants. These concessions are important because they affect effective rent.

The point being that what appears to be the deal on the surface may be something quite different underneath.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

Illinois Property Tax Abatement For Vacant Buildings

Author: Brett Harrington Category: Property Tax Tags: Illinois Property Tax, Property Tax, Property Tax Abatement

Friday
Aug 28, 2009

Illinois recently enacted HB 4120 regarding the abatement of taxes for businesses that occupy a previously vacant property. The Act states:

“Upon a majority vote of its governing body, any taxing district  may, after the determination of the assessed valuation of its property, order the county clerk to abate any portion of its taxes on any property if (i) a new business first occupies a facility located on the property during the taxable year, and (ii) the facility was vacant for a period of at least 24 continuous months prior to being occupied by the business. The abatement shall not exceed a period of 2 years and the aggregate amount of abated taxes for all taxing districts combined shall not exceed $4,000,000.”

Given the amount of vacant property on the market, this should prove to be an effective tax savings tool for Illinois businesses.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

Quantifying Obsolescence For Personal Property Tax Valuation

Author: Brett Harrington Category: Appraisal, Property Tax Tags: California Property Tax, economic obsolescence, functional obsolescence, Obsolescence, Property Tax

Thursday
Aug 27, 2009

The California State Board of Equalization recently released a draft of the proposed Guidelines for Substantiating Additional Obsolescence for Personal Property and Fixtures as part of a project to assist county assessors’ staff in identifying and quantifying obsolescence for personal property tax valuation.

Although the proposed guidelines do not offer anything that can be considered groundbreaking, they do serve as an overview of the process for identifying and calculating extraordinary obsolescence.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post

Cook County 1st Installment Property Tax Calculation Has Changed

Author: Brett Harrington Category: Property Tax Tags: Cook County Property Taxes

Tuesday
Aug 18, 2009

1st installment tax bills in Cook County have historically been computed at 50% of the property taxes paid for the preceding year. With the passage of S.B. 2125, 1st installment tax bills will be computed at 55% of the preceding year’s tax bills. Taxpayers in Cook County will want to accrue accordingly.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Comments
  • Read Entire Post
Older Entries

Copyright 2010 Taxing Issues – Property Tax Blog - All Rights reserved.

Wordpress theme by: WPUnlimited